Which of these actions is required to ensure that nonconformity does not recur?

To ensure that nonconformity does not recur, identifying process or system changes is vital. This action focuses on understanding the underlying causes of the nonconformity and implementing modifications to improve the process or system. By analyzing the specific factors that led to the nonconformity, organizations can adjust workflows, enhance training, refine procedural guidelines, or introduce new quality controls. This proactive approach not only addresses the immediate issue but also helps prevent similar nonconformities in the future.

In contrast, simply increasing the budget for compliance may not directly address the root causes of the problem and could lead to inefficiencies. Hiring external consultants, while potentially beneficial for gaining expertise, does not guarantee that systemic changes are made unless the organization takes actionable steps based on that expertise. Minimizing reporting frequency could limit visibility into ongoing issues, making it more challenging to identify and correct nonconformities effectively. Thus, the most effective means to prevent recurrence is to focus on meaningful changes to processes or systems based on thorough analysis.